NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 825M and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 575 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 247 Watt
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 10493
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 247 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 vs 10493 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 448 vs 384
- Around 43% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 782
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 428 vs 247
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 vs 782 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 vs 247 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 782 | 3017 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 428 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 | 10493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 825M | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK208 | GF110 |
Launch date | 27 January 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 787 | 788 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 247 Watt |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |