NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs ATI Radeon HD 5850

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 825M and ATI Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 941 MHz vs 725 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 151 Watt

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5850

• Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 52.2 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
• 3.8x more pipelines: 1440 vs 384
• 2.9x better floating-point performance: 2,088.0 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1979 vs 782
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 402 vs 247
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 vs 15796

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	782 1979
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	247 402
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15796 33977

Compare specifications (specs)