NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and NVIDIA GeForce 9200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 520 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 40 Watt
| Launch date | 12 July 2010 vs 17 April 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 520 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9200
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 502 vs 496
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 502 vs 496
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 502 vs 496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 502 vs 496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9200
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 | NVIDIA GeForce 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 275 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 275 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 496 | 502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 496 | 502 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 169 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 25 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 | NVIDIA GeForce 9200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GT218 | C78 |
| Launch date | 12 July 2010 | 17 April 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1686 | 1688 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 520 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | |
| Texture fill rate | 4.16 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 260 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR2 | |