NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- Around 76% better floating-point performance: 39.36 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
| Launch date | 12 July 2010 vs 4 June 2008 |
| Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 520 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 4.4 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 747 vs 496
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 747 vs 496
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 520 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 747 vs 496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 747 vs 496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 275 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 275 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 496 | 747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 496 | 747 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 118 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 24 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GT218 | G98 |
| Launch date | 12 July 2010 | 4 June 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1686 | 1683 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 520 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | 22.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.16 GTexel / s | 4.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 13 Watt |
| Transistor count | 260 million | 210 million |
| CUDA cores | 8 | |
| Gigaflops | 34 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-I |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||