NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs NVIDIA GeForce2 Go
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8400 and NVIDIA GeForce2 Go videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 540 MHz vs 143 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 180 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 64 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 332 MHz
- 20.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 81 vs 4
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 160 vs 95
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 December 2007 vs 11 November 2000 |
Core clock speed | 540 MHz vs 143 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 180 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 332 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 81 vs 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 vs 95 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce2 Go
- 132.4x more texture fill rate: 572 MTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 12.5x lower typical power consumption: 2 Watt vs 25 Watt
Texture fill rate | 572 MTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 2 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce2 Go
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 | NVIDIA GeForce2 Go |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 81 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 95 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 733 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 | NVIDIA GeForce2 Go | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Celsius |
Code name | G98 | NV11 B2 |
Launch date | 4 December 2007 | 11 November 2000 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69.78 | |
Place in performance rating | 1391 | 1393 |
Price now | $69.78 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 540 MHz | 143 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 20.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 180 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.32 GTexel / s | 572 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 2 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 20 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 5.31 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 332 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | DDR |