NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs ATI Radeon 7200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8400 and ATI Radeon 7200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 540 MHz vs 143 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 180 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 32 MB
- 7x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 143 MHz
- 27x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 81 vs 3
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 160 vs 94
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 December 2007 vs 1 June 2000 |
Core clock speed | 540 MHz vs 143 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 180 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 32 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 143 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 81 vs 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 vs 94 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 7200
- 230.6x more texture fill rate: 996 MTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 25 Watt
Texture fill rate | 996 MTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8400
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 7200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 | ATI Radeon 7200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 81 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 94 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 733 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 | ATI Radeon 7200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 6 |
Code name | G98 | R100 |
Launch date | 4 December 2007 | 1 June 2000 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69.78 | |
Place in performance rating | 1403 | 1405 |
Price now | $69.78 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 540 MHz | 143 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 20.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 180 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.32 GTexel / s | 996 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 30 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 5.31 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 143 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | DDR |