NVIDIA GeForce 840A vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840A and AMD Radeon HD 6770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1123 vs 964
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 4 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1123 vs 964 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770M
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 2002 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 221
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8338 vs 5596
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3044 vs 2314
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3044 vs 2314
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3117
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3117
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 2002 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 221 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8338 vs 5596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3044 vs 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3044 vs 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840A
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 840A | AMD Radeon HD 6770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1123 | 964 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5596 | 8338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2314 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2314 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 | 3348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.817 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 234.842 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.475 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.71 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 840A | AMD Radeon HD 6770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM108 | Whistler |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 4 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 987 | 989 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |