AMD Radeon R9 M360 vs NVIDIA GeForce 840A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce 840A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1812 vs 1123
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 396 vs 221
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8083 vs 5596
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2801 vs 2188
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3117
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2801 vs 2188
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3117
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 17 March 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1812 vs 1123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 396 vs 221 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8083 vs 5596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2801 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2801 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3117 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840A
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 2002 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2314 vs 1623
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2314 vs 1623
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2314 vs 1623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2314 vs 1623 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce 840A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1812 | 1123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 396 | 221 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8083 | 5596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.479 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.902 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2801 | 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1623 | 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2801 | 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1623 | 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce 840A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tropo | GM108 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 17 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1002 | 1003 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |