NVIDIA GeForce 840A vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840A and ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840A

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 525 MHz
  • 8.6x more texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s
  • 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
  • 20.6x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 42 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
  • 2.5x more memory clock speed: 2002 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 10.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1180 vs 114
  • 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3117 vs 426
  • 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3117 vs 426
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 March 2014 vs 28 June 2007
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 525 MHz
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 40
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops vs 42 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed 2002 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1180 vs 114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3117 vs 426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3117 vs 426

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

  • Around 65% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 346 vs 266
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 346 vs 266

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840A
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1180
114
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
266
346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3117
426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3117
426
Name NVIDIA GeForce 840A ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark 1180 114
PassMark - G2D Mark 266 346
Geekbench - OpenCL 5596
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2188
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2314
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2314
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3117 426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3117 426

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 840A ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell TeraScale
Code name GM108 RV610
Launch date 17 March 2014 28 June 2007
Place in performance rating 955 958
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz 525 MHz
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 42 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 384 40
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s 2.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 180 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 16.02 GB / s 6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 2002 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR2