NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 and ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 14.9x more texture fill rate: 41.6 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 128 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 1640 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 12.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 568 vs 46
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 December 2007 vs 1 July 2004 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 41.6 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1640 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 568 vs 46 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 9800
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 110 vs 77
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 110 vs 77 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 | ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 568 | 46 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 77 | 110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 | ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | R400 |
Code name | G92 | M18 |
Launch date | 11 December 2007 | 1 July 2004 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Place in performance rating | 1315 | 1316 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 416.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 41.6 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 135 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 160 million |
Boost clock speed | 350 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 52.5 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 300 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1640 MHz | 600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Powerplay |