NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 and ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 240 MHz
- 32x more pipelines: 128 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 150 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 64 MB
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 1640 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 189.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 568 vs 3
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 December 2007 vs 1 September 2002 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 240 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1640 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 568 vs 3 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
- 23.1x more texture fill rate: 960 MTexel / s vs 41.6 GTexel / s
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 111 vs 77
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 960 MTexel / s vs 41.6 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 vs 77 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 | ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 568 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 77 | 111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 | ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 7 |
Code name | G92 | M9 |
Launch date | 11 December 2007 | 1 September 2002 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Place in performance rating | 1315 | 1317 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 240 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 416.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 41.6 GTexel / s | 960 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 135 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 36 million |
Boost clock speed | 240 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 52.5 GB / s | 3.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 200 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1640 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | 128 |
Shared memory | 0 |