NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 11.4x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 22.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 382 vs 17
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 159 vs 122
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2007 vs 17 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 382 vs 17 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 vs 122 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 382 | 17 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 | 122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1989 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1989 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rankine |
Code name | G92 | NV31 A1 |
Launch date | 1 November 2007 | 17 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1259 | 1262 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 350 MHz |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 160 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 1.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 80 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-HE | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 191 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |