NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 155 Watt
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 159 vs 98
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2007 vs 8 November 2006 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 155 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 vs 98 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 576 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 36.8 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 128 vs 64
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 345.6 gflops vs 160 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 768 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 590 vs 382
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1989
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1989
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops vs 160 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 768 MB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 590 vs 382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 1989 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 1989 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 382 | 590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 | 98 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1989 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1989 | 3349 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G80 |
Launch date | 1 November 2007 | 8 November 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1250 | 1266 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 576 MHz |
CUDA cores | 64 | 575 |
Floating-point performance | 160 gflops | 345.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 36.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 155 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 681 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 270 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
SLI |