NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
  • 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 155 Watt
  • Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 159 vs 98
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 November 2007 vs 8 November 2006
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 90 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 155 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 159 vs 98

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX

  • Around 15% higher core clock speed: 576 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • 2.3x more texture fill rate: 36.8 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 128 vs 64
  • 2.2x better floating-point performance: 345.6 gflops vs 160 gflops
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 768 MB vs 512 MB
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 590 vs 382
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1989
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1989
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 576 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate 36.8 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s
Pipelines 128 vs 64
Floating-point performance 345.6 gflops vs 160 gflops
Maximum memory size 768 MB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 590 vs 382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 vs 1989
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 vs 1989

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
382
590
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
159
98
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1989
3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1989
3349
Name NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark 382 590
PassMark - G2D Mark 159 98
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1989 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1989 3349

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla
Code name G92 G80
Launch date 1 November 2007 8 November 2006
Place in performance rating 1250 1266
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $599

Technical info

Core clock speed 500 MHz 576 MHz
CUDA cores 64 575
Floating-point performance 160 gflops 345.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 90 nm
Pipelines 64 128
Texture fill rate 16 GTexel / s 36.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 155 Watt
Transistor count 754 million 681 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-HE PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size large
Length 270 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 3.3 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 768 MB
Memory bandwidth 51.2 GB / s 86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 800 MHz 900 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Gigathread technology
HDCP-capable
PCI-E 16x
PowerMizer 7.0
SLI