NVIDIA GeForce 920A vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920A and NVIDIA GeForce 930M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920A
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 159 vs 150
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 vs 150 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930M
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 22.58 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- Around 64% better floating-point performance: 722.7 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1012 vs 834
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5258 vs 3693
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 22.58 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1012 vs 834 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5258 vs 3693 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920A | NVIDIA GeForce 930M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 834 | 1012 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 | 150 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3693 | 5258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.225 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.246 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1987 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1987 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 920A | NVIDIA GeForce 930M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK208B | GM108 |
| Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1201 | 1202 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 722.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s | 22.58 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||

