NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
| Launch date | 1 June 2008 vs 9 June 2007 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 567 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 9.2 GTexel / s vs 4.54 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 32 vs 8
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 73.6 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 666 MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 208 vs 102
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 84 vs 80
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 567 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 9.2 GTexel / s vs 4.54 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 32 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 73.6 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 666 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 208 vs 102 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 84 vs 80 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 102 | 208 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 80 | 84 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1857 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1857 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G98 | G84 |
| Launch date | 1 June 2008 | 9 June 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59.95 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1485 | 1486 |
| Price now | $59.95 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.99 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 567 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | 73.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 8 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.54 GTexel / s | 9.2 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 210 million | 289 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 5.33 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 666 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3, GDDR2 |
| Shared memory | no | |
Technologies |
||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
