NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS and NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 16 billion / sec vs 4.54 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 64 vs 8
- 7.6x better floating-point performance: 169.6 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 666 MHz
- 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 534 vs 102
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 November 2008 vs 1 June 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 16 billion / sec vs 4.54 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 64 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 169.6 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 666 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 vs 102 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 567 MHz vs 530 MHz
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 80 vs 50
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 567 MHz vs 530 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 80 vs 50 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS | NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 | 102 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 | 80 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2414 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS | NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G94 | G98 |
| Launch date | 1 November 2008 | 1 June 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1484 | 1485 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59.95 | |
| Price now | $59.95 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.99 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 530 MHz | 567 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 169.6 gflops | 22.4 gflops |
| Gigaflops | 254 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 64 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 16 billion / sec | 4.54 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 5.33 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 666 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |

