NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs AMD FirePro D700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and AMD FirePro D700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 11.9x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 274 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2016 vs 18 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 274 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D700
- 4.6x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 384
- 4.6x better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 5480 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25127 vs 6325
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.325 vs 28.91
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1338.806 vs 312.94
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.419 vs 1.83
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.354 vs 27.833
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6051 vs 2486
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3587
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6051 vs 2486
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3587
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25127 vs 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 vs 28.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 vs 312.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 vs 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 vs 27.833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6051 vs 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6051 vs 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3587 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D700
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | AMD FirePro D700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 25127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 74.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 1338.806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 6.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 91.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 6051 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 6051 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | AMD FirePro D700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 28 June 2016 | 18 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1071 | 569 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 108.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 274 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 263.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5480 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |