NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT and NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 20.8 billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
Launch date | 21 February 2008 vs 1 October 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTO
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 81 Watt vs 96 Watt
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 900 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt vs 96 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTO
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.465 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3161 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3161 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 127 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G94 | G71 |
Launch date | 21 February 2008 | 1 October 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Place in performance rating | 1587 | not rated |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1625 MHz | 650 MHz |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 208 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 96 Watt | 81 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | 42.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1320 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |