NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 3x more pipelines: 192 vs 64
  • Around 47% better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 208 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 5.1x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 96 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB or 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 614 vs 483
  • 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 200 vs 45
  • 9.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.418 vs 0.465
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 280 vs 127
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 280 vs 127
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 September 2014 vs 21 February 2008
Pipelines 192 vs 64
Floating-point performance 306.0 gflops vs 208 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt vs 96 Watt
Maximum memory size 1 GB or 1 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 614 vs 483
PassMark - G2D Mark 200 vs 45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.418 vs 0.465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 280 vs 127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 280 vs 127

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

  • 2x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 20.8 billion / sec vs 12.75 GTexel / s
  • 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3161 vs 519
  • 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3161 vs 519
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1625 MHz vs 797 MHz
Texture fill rate 20.8 billion / sec vs 12.75 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3161 vs 519
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3161 vs 519

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
614
483
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
200
45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.418
0.465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
280
127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
519
3161
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
280
127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
519
3161
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 614 483
PassMark - G2D Mark 200 45
Geekbench - OpenCL 2292
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.418 0.465
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 142.734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.395
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 17.317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 895
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 280 127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 519 3161
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 895
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 280 127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 519 3161
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

Essentials

Architecture Kepler 2.0 Tesla
Code name GK208B G94
Launch date 29 September 2014 21 February 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $49 $179
Place in performance rating 1593 1591
Price now $54.99 $39.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 15.44 23.72

Technical info

Core clock speed 797 MHz 1625 MHz
CUDA cores 192 64
Floating-point performance 306.0 gflops 208 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 98 °C 105 °C
Pipelines 192 64
Texture fill rate 12.75 GTexel / s 20.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt 96 Watt
Transistor count 505 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal S / PDIF
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0 16x PCI-E 2.0
Height 2.713" (6.9 cm) 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 2.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm) 9" (22.9 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None 6-pin
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.4 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB or 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) 57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz 900 MHz
Memory type DDR3 / GDDR5 GDDR3

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
SLI