NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 8.7x more texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 64 vs 8
- 8.6x better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 376 vs 93
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 64 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 vs 93 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 334 vs 87
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 vs 87 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 | 93 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 87 | 334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3076 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3076 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G94 | G98 |
Launch date | 21 August 2008 | 15 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1339 | 486 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 22.4 gflops |
Gigaflops | 240 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 2.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD |