NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs ATI Radeon 9200 LE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and ATI Radeon 9200 LE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 250 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 1.9 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 130 nm vs 150 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 128 MB vs 64 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 11.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 34 vs 3
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 October 2003 vs 1 May 2003 |
Core clock speed | 475 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 1.9 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 128 MB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 34 vs 3 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9200 LE
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 46 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 vs 126
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 46 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 vs 126 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9200 LE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | ATI Radeon 9200 LE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 34 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 | 128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | ATI Radeon 9200 LE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Rankine | Rage 7 |
Code name | NV36 A1 | RV280 |
Launch date | 23 October 2003 | 1 May 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 1238 | 1240 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 150 nm |
Texture fill rate | 1.9 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 46 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 82 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 8x | AGP 8x |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0a | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 1.5 (2.1) | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2 | DDR |