NVIDIA GeForce G103M vs NVIDIA GeForce G210M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G103M and NVIDIA GeForce G210M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G103M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 5.12 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 34 vs 19
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2009 vs 15 June 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 5.12 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 34 vs 19 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G210M
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 640 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- Around 88% better floating-point performance: 48 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 128 vs 63
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 640 MHz |
Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 48 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 128 vs 63 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G103M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G210M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce G103M | NVIDIA GeForce G210M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 34 | 19 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 63 | 128 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1294 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1294 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce G103M | NVIDIA GeForce G210M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | G98 | GT218 |
Launch date | 1 September 2009 | 15 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1663 | 1664 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 640 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops | 48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 5.12 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 260 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Gigaflops | 72 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGA |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |