AMD FirePro M3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce G103M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M3900 and NVIDIA GeForce G103M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M3900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 640 MHz
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 6 GTexel / s vs 5.12 GTexel / s
- 20x more pipelines: 160 vs 8
- 9.4x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 19 October 2010 vs 1 September 2009 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 640 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s vs 5.12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 160 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G103M
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 20 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M3900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G103M
Name | AMD FirePro M3900 | NVIDIA GeForce G103M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4446 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 34 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 63 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M3900 | NVIDIA GeForce G103M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Seymour | G98 |
Launch date | 19 October 2010 | 1 September 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1661 | 1663 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 640 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s | 5.12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | chip-down | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |