NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- 302.3x more texture fill rate: 23.49 GTexel/s vs 77.7 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 12.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 365 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8354 vs 3683
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8354 vs 3683
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Jan 2021 vs 24 March 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.49 GTexel/s vs 77.7 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 365 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8354 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8354 vs 3683 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- 4x more pipelines: 1024 vs 256
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) vs 2 GB
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 1707 MHz vs 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective)
Pipelines | 1024 vs 256 |
Maximum memory size | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1707 MHz vs 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8354 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8354 | 3683 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12830 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4118 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4118 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GP108 | GF110 |
Launch date | 13 Jan 2021 | 24 March 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 153 | 768 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $184 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 31.32 GFLOPS (1:24) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 751.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 23.49 GTexel/s | 77.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 365 Watt |
Transistor count | 1800 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,244.2 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 8-pin |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Memory bandwidth | 40.10 GB/s | 327.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) | 1707 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |