NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 105 Watt
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 512 MB or 1 GB vs 384 MB
• 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 510 vs 327

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 1340 MHz
• Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 26.4 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s
• Around 3% better floating-point performance: 264 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
• Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 102 vs 52
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2160 vs 1385
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2160 vs 1385

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	510 327
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	52 102
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1385 2160
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1385 2160

Compare specifications (specs)