NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 69 Watt
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 52
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1570 vs 1385
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1570 vs 1385
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 17 November 2009 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 69 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 vs 52 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1570 vs 1385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1570 vs 1385 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 5.9x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 257.28 gflops vs 96 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB or 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 510 vs 286
- 12.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9236 vs 751
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1979 vs 1158
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1979 vs 1158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB or 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 510 vs 286 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 vs 751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1979 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1979 vs 1158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 286 | 510 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 52 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 751 | 9236 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 442 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 442 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1158 | 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1158 | 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1570 | 1385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1570 | 1385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF108 | GT215 |
| Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 17 November 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1383 | 1386 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | |
| Price now | $37.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.27 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 48 | 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 96 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 3.0 billion / sec | 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 69 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 727 million |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105C C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB or 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 54.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz |
| Memory type | (G)DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 240
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5750
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 330 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M vs
IntelHD Graphics 5000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
