NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 6.1x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
Launch date | 10 January 2010 vs 28 March 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1688 MHz vs 990 MHz
- 6x more texture fill rate: 43.2 billion / sec vs 7.2 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 432.1 gflops vs 95.04 gflops
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 769 vs 170
- 7.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 366 vs 49
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz vs 990 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion / sec vs 7.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops vs 95.04 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 769 vs 170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 366 vs 49 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 170 | 769 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 49 | 366 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5606 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2145 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2145 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT216 | G92 |
Launch date | 10 January 2010 | 28 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1547 | 438 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 990 MHz | 1688 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | 128 |
Floating-point performance | 95.04 gflops | 432.1 gflops |
Gigaflops | 142 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s | 43.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 754 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMIVGASingle Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
SLI | ||
3D Vision |