NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 3.6x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 450 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 317 vs 68
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 136 vs 61
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1455 vs 1044
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1455 vs 1044

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G

• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 29 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	317 68
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	136 61
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1455 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1455 1044

Compare specifications (specs)