NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 47% better floating-point performance: 155.5 gflops vs 105.6 gflops
Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 15 June 2009 |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops vs 105.6 gflops |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 6.48 GTexel / s
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1727 vs 1364
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1727 vs 1364
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s vs 6.48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1727 vs 1364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1727 vs 1364 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.756 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 637 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 637 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1364 | 1727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1364 | 1727 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 218 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 39 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5644 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF119 | GT216 |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 15 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1596 | 1599 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 105.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 486 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Gigaflops | 158 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Dual Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | HDA | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB / s | 16 (DDR2), 25 (DDR3) |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |