NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 310 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 310
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.991 vs 2.756
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 June 2012 vs 2 April 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.991 vs 2.756 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 523 MHz
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 6.48 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
- Around 55% better floating-point performance: 155.5 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1796 MHz vs 1750 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 637 vs 431
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1148 vs 918
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1364 vs 1229
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 637 vs 431
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1148 vs 918
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1364 vs 1229
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 523 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops vs 100.4 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz vs 1750 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 637 vs 431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1148 vs 918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1364 vs 1229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 637 vs 431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1148 vs 918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1364 vs 1229 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 310
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 310 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 263 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 880 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.991 | 2.756 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 76.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.974 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.835 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 431 | 637 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 918 | 1148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1229 | 1364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 431 | 637 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 918 | 1148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1229 | 1364 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 310 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GF119 | GF119 |
Launch date | 26 June 2012 | 2 April 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Place in performance rating | 1596 | 1597 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 523 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 100.4 gflops | 155.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 4.184 GTexel / s | 6.48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 156 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14 GB / s | 14.37 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1796 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |