NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand and NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 17.28 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s
- 4.5x more pipelines: 144 vs 32
- 5.2x better floating-point performance: 414.7 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB
Launch date | 24 April 2012 vs 14 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.28 GTexel / s vs 8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 144 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 512 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 410 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 221 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 37 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1640 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1640 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF116 | G96 |
Launch date | 24 April 2012 | 14 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1602 | 1599 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $527 | |
Price now | $527 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.73 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 144 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 17.28 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 |