NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM and ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 337 MHz
- 28x more texture fill rate: 37.8 GTexel / s vs 1.348 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 130 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 486 MHz
- 22.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 556 vs 25
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 July 2009 vs 13 February 2004 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 337 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s vs 1.348 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 486 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 556 vs 25 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 137 vs 134
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 137 vs 134 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM | ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 134 | 137 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 556 | 25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM | ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 8 |
Code name | G92B | M10 |
Launch date | 1 July 2009 | 13 February 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 1166 | 1170 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 337 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 362.9 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 112 | |
Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s | 1.348 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 76 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | 7.78 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz | 486 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |