ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 17.1x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 330 vs 134
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 1 July 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 vs 134 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 9.5x more texture fill rate: 37.8 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 112 vs 80
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 362.9 gflops vs 80 gflops
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 556 vs 181
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1733
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1733
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 112 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 362.9 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 556 vs 181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1733 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 181 | 556 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 | 134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.489 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 904 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 904 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1733 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1733 | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Park | G92B |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 1 July 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1156 | 1158 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | 362.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 4 GTexel / s | 37.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2200 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5? | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |