NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce G205M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 and NVIDIA GeForce G205M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 450 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 90 nm
- 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 601 vs 92
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 989
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 989
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 March 2009 vs 8 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 90 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 601 vs 92 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 989 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 989 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G205M
- 10.7x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 294 vs 59
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 294 vs 59 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G205M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | NVIDIA GeForce G205M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 601 | 92 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 294 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3108 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3108 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 989 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 989 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | NVIDIA GeForce G205M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G92B | MCP79MX |
| Launch date | 4 March 2009 | 8 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1038 | 1025 |
| Price now | $114.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.91 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1836 MHz | 450 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 128 | |
| Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 14 Watt |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.0 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 250 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 250 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2500M
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7950 GTX
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 250 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6750
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 250 vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
