AMD Radeon HD 6750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 5.6x more pipelines: 720 vs 128
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 387.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 86 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1043 vs 595
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 273 vs 56
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3378 vs 3108
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3378 vs 3108
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 January 2011 vs 4 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 720 vs 128 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 387.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1043 vs 595 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 vs 56 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3378 vs 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3378 vs 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz
| Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1043 | 595 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 | 56 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.041 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.664 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.074 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2100 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3378 | 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2100 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3378 | 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Juniper | G92B |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch date | 21 January 2011 | 4 March 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | $199 |
| Place in performance rating | 1045 | 1048 |
| Price now | $49.99 | $114.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 33.46 | 9.91 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops | 387.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 720 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 47.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 754 million |
| Core clock speed | 1836 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6750 with others
AMDRadeon HD 6750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 250
AMDRadeon HD 6750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4550
AMDRadeon HD 6750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650M
AMDRadeon HD 6750 vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
AMDRadeon HD 6750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
AMDRadeon HD 6750 vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
