NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1249 MHz vs 480 MHz
- 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 2x 8
- 6.3x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 2x 19.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 2x 256 MB
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 381 vs 67
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1249 MHz vs 480 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 2x 8 |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 2x 19.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 2x 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 vs 67 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
- Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 2x 3.84 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 89 vs 69
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 3.84 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 89 vs 69 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 | 67 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 69 | 89 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3123 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8210 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT215 | G98 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 11 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1425 | 1428 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $163.14 | |
Price now | $168 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1249 MHz | 480 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | 2x 19.2 gflops |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 2x 8 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 2x 3.84 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA | 4x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 2x 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 64 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |