ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M

Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5670 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670

• 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 240 gflops
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 800 vs 381
• 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 290 vs 69

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M

• Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1249 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 64 Watt
• 12.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8210 vs 644
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3123 vs 2113
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3123 vs 2113

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5670
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	800 381
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	290 69
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	644 8210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2113 3123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2113 3123

Compare specifications (specs)