NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
- 4.7x better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 1,882 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11173 vs 4551
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11173 vs 4551
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2016 vs 2 September 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s vs 58.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 1,882 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 vs 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 vs 4551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 600x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3690
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3343
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3690
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3343
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6886 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17482 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6886 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17482 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15537 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 | 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 6886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 17482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 | 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 6886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 17482 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7537 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Bonaire |
Launch date | 27 May 2016 | 2 September 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 273 | 274 |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1050 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 1,882 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | 58.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 183 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10 GB/s | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |