NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 701.2x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13448 vs 11173
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13448 vs 11173
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3690
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3690
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 27 May 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13448 vs 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13448 vs 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1139 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1404 MHz
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15549 vs 9212
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 vs 550
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55525 vs 36571
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1139 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1404 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15549 vs 9212 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 vs 550 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55525 vs 36571 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9212 | 15549 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 550 | 887 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36571 | 55525 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13448 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13448 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7537 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 27 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 269 | 272 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1404 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1139 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 10 GB/s |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |