NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1156 MHz
• Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1471 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 210 Watt
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 805 vs 769
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 vs 184.405
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 vs 1765.06
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 vs 12.606
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 vs 79.32
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 14462
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 14462

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 330.00 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1408
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13154 vs 12720
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 vs 62633
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1022.925 vs 901.388
• Around 17% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1497 vs 1283

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12720 13154
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	805 769
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	62633 163998
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	187.131 184.405
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2548.187 1765.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.882 12.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	117.673 79.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	901.388 1022.925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 14462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 14462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1283 1497

Compare specifications (specs)