NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 70% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 584.4x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 275 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12712 vs 9484
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 804 vs 799
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 vs 155.307
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 vs 12.49
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 vs 857.575
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 8673
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 8673

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

• 2.9x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1408
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 vs 2548.187
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 vs 117.673
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3717
• 4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 vs 1278

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12712 9484
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	804 799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	187.131 155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2548.187 3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.882 12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	117.673 153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	901.388 857.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1278 5170

Compare specifications (specs)