NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 21281 vs 3718
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 21281 vs 3718
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 19012 vs 3358
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 19012 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 20 September 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 21281 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 21281 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19012 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19012 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 944 vs 499
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21579 vs 10211
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25051 vs 16877
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25051 vs 16877
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 944 vs 499 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 21579 vs 10211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25051 vs 16877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25051 vs 16877 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 499 | 944 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10211 | 21579 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 10 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 21281 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 21281 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16877 | 25051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16877 | 25051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19012 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19012 | 3358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 128964 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 397.811 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5351.059 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.783 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1790 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | N18E-G0 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 12 | 9 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $1,279.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 18,600 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
