AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1590 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1536
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 vs 480
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19832 vs 10172
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20988 vs 16828
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20988 vs 16828
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 23 April 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz vs 1590 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 1536 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 6144 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 vs 480 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19832 vs 10172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 vs 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 vs 16828 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3717
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3357
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3357
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | 480 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19832 | 10172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20988 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20988 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 8054 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131707 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5564 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 21 | N18E-G0 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 23 April 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2249 | |
| Place in performance rating | 112 | 113 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2507 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1203 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.25 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 240.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 601.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 450 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 6144 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Embedded
AMDRadeon Pro W6800 vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
