NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 26.7 billion / sec vs 20 GTexel / s
- Around 7% better floating-point performance: 855.4 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2650 vs 763
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 403
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.079 vs 7.457
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 741.303 vs 512.081
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2999 vs 1643
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3660 vs 3314
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2999 vs 1643
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3660 vs 3314
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2010 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 26.7 billion / sec vs 20 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 855.4 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2650 vs 763 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.079 vs 7.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 741.303 vs 512.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2999 vs 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3660 vs 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2999 vs 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3660 vs 3314 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- 2.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 352
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3321
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3321
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 800 vs 352 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3321 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2650 | 763 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.079 | 7.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 741.303 | 512.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.516 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.513 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.492 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2999 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3660 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2999 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3660 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF100 | Broadway |
Launch date | 31 May 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Place in performance rating | 843 | 844 |
Price now | $263.28 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.73 | |
Technical info |
||
Compute performance | 30x | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 352 | |
Floating-point performance | 855.4 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 352 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 26.7 billion / sec | 20 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pins | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 102.6 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
HDMI 1.3a |