NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 43.6 GTexel / s vs 26.7 billion / sec
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 1,045.6 gflops vs 855.4 gflops
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.161 vs 19.079
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 781.734 vs 741.303
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.218 vs 24.513
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.212 vs 64.492
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3537 vs 2999
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3537 vs 2999
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 September 2011 vs 31 May 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 43.6 GTexel / s vs 26.7 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops vs 855.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.161 vs 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 781.734 vs 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.218 vs 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.212 vs 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3537 vs 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3537 vs 2999 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 778 MHz
- Around 5% higher pipelines: 352 vs 336
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2650 vs 1872
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 418
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9276 vs 7872
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.516 vs 2.125
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3660 vs 3398
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 3117
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3660 vs 3398
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 3117
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 778 MHz |
Pipelines | 352 vs 336 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2650 vs 1872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9276 vs 7872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.516 vs 2.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3660 vs 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 vs 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3660 vs 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 vs 3117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1872 | 2650 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7872 | 9276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.161 | 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 781.734 | 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.125 | 2.516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.218 | 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.212 | 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3537 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3398 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3537 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3398 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 | 3321 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF114 | GF100 |
Launch date | 24 September 2011 | 31 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $279 |
Place in performance rating | 838 | 841 |
Price now | $199.99 | $263.28 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.01 | 12.73 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 778 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 855.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 352 |
Texture fill rate | 43.6 GTexel / s | 26.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,100 million |
Compute performance | 30x | |
CUDA cores | 352 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 210 mm | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | Two 6-pins |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.2 GB / s | 102.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |