NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce G103M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 and NVIDIA GeForce G103M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 640 MHz
- 49.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 54.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 5.12 GTexel / s
- 96x more pipelines: 2x 384 vs 8
- 102x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,305.6 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 25 January 2011 vs 1 September 2009 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 640 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 54.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 5.12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 384 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,305.6 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G103M
- 12.1x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 170 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G103M
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 | NVIDIA GeForce G103M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.3 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 34 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 63 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 | NVIDIA GeForce G103M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF114 | G98 |
Launch date | 25 January 2011 | 1 September 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1653 | 1655 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 640 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,305.6 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 384 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 54.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | 5.12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 292 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 128.3 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |