AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 59.7x more texture fill rate: 15.20 GTexel/s vs 2x 54.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 40 nm
- 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 170 Watt
Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 vs 25 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.20 GTexel/s vs 2x 54.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
- 6x more pipelines: 2x 384 vs 128
Pipelines | 2x 384 vs 128 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4930 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.3 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Mendocino | GF114 |
Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 | 25 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1651 | 1653 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz | |
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 30.40 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 972.8 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 486.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 2x 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 7.600 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 15.20 GTexel/s | 2x 54.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 170 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,305.6 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 3x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 292 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 2x 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 2x 128.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 4008 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |