NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 vs ATI FireGL V5600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 and ATI FireGL V5600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 93% higher core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 7.7x more texture fill rate: 49.4 billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 4.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 120
- 8.2x better floating-point performance: 1,581.1 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB
- 13.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4627 vs 341
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 490 vs 445
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2204
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2204
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 November 2010 vs 28 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1544 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 49.4 billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 120 |
Floating-point performance | 1,581.1 gflops vs 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4627 vs 341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 vs 445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2204 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V5600
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 244 Watt
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 244 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V5600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | ATI FireGL V5600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4627 | 341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 | 445 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15160 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.378 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.363 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2204 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | ATI FireGL V5600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF110 | RV630 |
Launch date | 9 November 2010 | 28 June 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $599 |
Place in performance rating | 640 | 637 |
Price now | $289.88 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1544 MHz | 800 MHz |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,581.1 gflops | 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 512 | 120 |
Texture fill rate | 49.4 billion / sec | 6.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 244 Watt | 89 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 390 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin and One 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.4 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) | 2200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |