NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7730M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition and AMD Radeon HD 7730M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 719 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 80.53 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 1344 vs 512
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,933 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.656 vs 15.244
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.103 vs 1.524
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6514 vs 3220
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6700 vs 3350
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 24 April 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 719 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 80.53 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,933 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.656 vs 15.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.103 vs 1.524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6514 vs 3220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6700 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7730M
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1777 vs 1543
- 68.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1777 vs 26.1
- 30.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3220 vs 105.1
- 28x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 119.6
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1777 vs 1543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1777 vs 26.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3220 vs 105.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 119.6 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7730M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition | AMD Radeon HD 7730M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.656 | 15.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.103 | 1.524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1543 | 1777 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26.1 | 1777 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6514 | 3220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 105.1 | 3220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6700 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 119.6 | 3350 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 778 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 215 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6551 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.172 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.319 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.757 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition | AMD Radeon HD 7730M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Chelsea |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1154 | 1157 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,933 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 80.53 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Boost clock speed | 675 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon 625
