NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition and AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 80.53 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 1,933 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.656 vs 14.771
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.103 vs 1.219
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6514 vs 2540
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6700 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 8 January 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 80.53 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,933 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.656 vs 14.771 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.103 vs 1.219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6514 vs 2540 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6700 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 719 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1759 vs 1543
- 67.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1759 vs 26.1
- 24.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2540 vs 105.1
- 28.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 119.6
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 719 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1759 vs 1543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1759 vs 26.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2540 vs 105.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 119.6 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.656 | 14.771 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.103 | 1.219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1543 | 1759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26.1 | 1759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6514 | 2540 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 105.1 | 2540 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6700 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 119.6 | 3355 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 942 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5875 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Oland |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 8 January 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1167 | 1170 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,933 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 80.53 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce3 Ti200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon R7 A360
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640
